You think you're so clever.
I am not convinced.
No, I am clever. I don't think so, I know so. That - combined with logic, knowlege and critical thinking - are why I know this is really fucking stupid. As for you being convinced, well, your lack of critical thinking and research are not my problem.
You said my skepticisim is entirely arbitrary - Which doesn't actually make sense, since it's a position of opinion, and ALL opinions are arbitrary, since arbitrary means "Based on or subject to individual discretion, will or preference", I'd suggest you think about what you say more carefully.
That aside, I assume you meant to say that you think my skepticisim of the idea is pointless and stupid, and that I don't know THE TRUTH, MAN.
So, State your case and provide your evidence. If it is irrefutable by logic, methodology, and it passes the test of Falsifiability, and of course, doesn't fall afoul of Occam's razor, then I'll concede, you win, and you're right.
Of course, If you back down and won't do it, or fail those tests, and it's goodnight, Gracie, you're wrong, done, finished, and we'll hear no more about it without the admission of new - and very fucking compelling - evidence.
There's your choices - Prove your crazy bullshit, is not, well, crazy bullshit, or GTFO.
Now, as for the rest of you - Conspiracy theories, and the psychology of them are honestly fascinating. A whirl of logical fallacies, paranoia, the search for meaning and the constant craving of validation, importance, and gratification all distilled down into crazy bullshit - not to mention the amazing psychological projections on the behalf of the conspiracy believers, is stunning.
Not to mention how people gain emotional and intellectual satisfaction from them, as quite often they satisfy the need for understanding of the world and events within it, and to quantify and categorise the events and people within the world in an acceptable fashion.
Also, even more interesting than that is the way that conspiracy theories always fall into a template of one kind or another, and are hardly ever about things that are entirely innocent, but of massive, morally abhorrent events(real or imagined) and assign moral responsibility to a particular group(who may or may not exist) - whom, of course, the believer is NEVER EVER a part of - and is clearly imaginable, and easy to picture or conceptualise in one's mind.
Also interestingly, this almost always excuses the Beliver of any and all moral responsibility or need for action in regards to any event as such, no matter what it is, because it's always, always some other person or group's fault.
This also applies to scientific matters - Something that's hard for you to comprehend through lack of knowledge and understanding? IT OBVIOUSLY NEVER HAPPENED! IT'S JUST ALL THOSE SCIENTISTS, MOTHERFUCKIN' LYIN AND GETTIN' ME PISSED!
Interestingly, this lack of understanding often plays into the greater conspiracy theories at large - For example, the people who complain that the fires in the WTC towers were not hot enough to melt steel(or in the memorable case of rosie o'donnell, claiming that NO fire is hot enough to melt steel, showing a base misunderstanding on how steel is made) without knowing or acknowledging that while it might not be hot enough to Liquify steel, it is certainly hot enough to make it soften to the point of pliability, and when said pliable hot steel is a structural support in a very big building - shit gets real.
Anyway, that's enough nattering from me. I think you get the point, it's interesting. Utterly ludicrous bullshit, but interesting all the same.
Not to mention, as I said, the theories themselves, which are often such intricate, delicate constructions, propped up on every other part of it like an enormous house of cards, ballanced on another house of cards, ballanced on another house of cards, and so on.