Maytag's Playhouse => Pop Culture => Topic started by: akashayi on October 06, 2009, 06:54:04 pm

Title: Movies!
Post by: akashayi on October 06, 2009, 06:54:04 pm
Starting a new thread for movie discussions, one that's season-free! Take that, seasonal movie threads.

What has everyone been watching? And don't say zombieland, cause I still need to catch that, damn it ;P

I got kidnapped randomly this afternoon to go catch Ponyo in theater. It was basically an animated children's book, which has it's merits in some artsy ways, I guess. But this was the first Ghibli production I've ever been disappointed with, and I was really torn by the lack of solid plot and character development. So yeah, sadness.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: shadowfire on October 06, 2009, 07:41:49 pm
equalibrium =  best movie of all time
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on October 06, 2009, 08:38:16 pm
Anyone seen Pandorum? I think my theatre's gonna get it this week and I want to know if it's any good.

(For the life of me, I don't know why we didn't get Zombieland or Cloudy With a Chance)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on October 07, 2009, 12:40:36 am
Gods and Generals, Gettysburg, The watchmen
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: parameciumkid on October 07, 2009, 03:40:02 pm
Serenity is made of win.
In fact, River has pure liquid win flowing through her blood vessels. She's just that awesome.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: No.Na. on October 12, 2009, 03:13:18 pm
i saw tron for the first time a week ago... I am so happy ^__^

as for what i want to see, where  the wild things are is a must!

i was wondering about paranormal activity though, has anyone seen it? it is supposedly like the blair witch project, but I remember that kinda sucking for me. the previews all seem like cheap shock spooks.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Dragonizer on October 15, 2009, 02:44:06 pm
Well, I saw District 9 a while back and declared it as my favorite movie ever. Then I saw Inglorious Basterds about a week after and declared that as my favorite movier ever. Theeen just a few days ago, I saw Zombieland (sorry, Akashayi, there was no getting around it!) and guess what my favorite movie is now? :P
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on October 16, 2009, 12:48:25 pm
Well, I saw District 9 a while back and declared it as my favorite movie ever. Then I saw Inglorious Basterds about a week after and declared that as my favorite movier ever. Theeen just a few days ago, I saw Zombieland (sorry, Akashayi, there was no getting around it!) and guess what my favorite movie is now? :P

Where the Wild Things Are?
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Dragonizer on October 16, 2009, 02:28:10 pm
Well, I saw District 9 a while back and declared it as my favorite movie ever. Then I saw Inglorious Basterds about a week after and declared that as my favorite movier ever. Theeen just a few days ago, I saw Zombieland (sorry, Akashayi, there was no getting around it!) and guess what my favorite movie is now? :P

Where the Wild Things Are?

Ahahaha, no. That movie looks pretty terrible, actually.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on October 16, 2009, 09:57:24 pm
Well, I saw District 9 a while back and declared it as my favorite movie ever. Then I saw Inglorious Basterds about a week after and declared that as my favorite movier ever. Theeen just a few days ago, I saw Zombieland (sorry, Akashayi, there was no getting around it!) and guess what my favorite movie is now? :P

Where the Wild Things Are?

Ahahaha, no. That movie looks pretty terrible, actually.

Really? I have rather high hopes for it.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on October 17, 2009, 10:17:27 am
Here's are two movies I really like:
The Dark Knight, Gattaca.

The last good movie I saw:
Nick and Nora's Infinite Playlist!  :-*
It was adorable.  :-*

Movies I want to see right now:
Moon.
Zombieland.
Capitalism, a Love Story.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: No.Na. on October 19, 2009, 11:27:07 pm
I recently watched online to my displeasure Jennifer's body. which i knew was going to be bad, but I never expected it to be as bad as it was >_< I can't say I will ever like this movie.

I watched the 1999 alice in wonderland with whoopi Goldberg  as the cheshire cat and really liked it.

and a few friends of mine said they really liked where the wild things are, I have to go and see it myself, it was explained to me as fun nonsense. which i happen to enjoy.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: parameciumkid on October 20, 2009, 02:15:01 pm
Wait, Whoopi Goldberg as the cat? Where can I get this movie? I must see it!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: No.Na. on October 20, 2009, 11:44:34 pm
Wait, Whoopi Goldberg as the cat? Where can I get this movie? I must see it!

http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/alice_in_wonderland/ I saws it here. it was really quite entertaining, and the creatures where done by jom henson's creature shop

(http://www.filmdope.com/Gallery/ActorsG/6682-24488.gif)
Scariest cat ever!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on October 20, 2009, 11:50:06 pm
Heh, that was the one with Martin Short as the hatter, wasn't it?
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on October 24, 2009, 12:04:33 pm
I saw Whip It earlier this month, and it was very good.  The happy ending was for the most part too simplistic, but unavoidable, because otherwise the ending would have been a bit too depressing (and the rest of the movie nicely balanced that with realistic dramatic moments).  Ellen Page delivered a strong performance, and the roller derby scenes were nicely choreographed and filmed.  Overall, it was funny and a good "feel-good" type of movie  :).
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: No.Na. on October 26, 2009, 04:17:06 pm
Heh, that was the one with Martin Short as the hatter, wasn't it?

yeah it was. he played a good hatter.

I watched paranormal activity this weekend and i have to say, I am glad i didn't pay for it. cause it was not the scariest movie ever I can say however that hit had it's moments. it is best watched with a spouse or mate. the first hour of the movie really made me want the end, and if you are a seasoned horror movie vet then you already know what is going to happen in the movie.

things i think that would have made it scarier would be:
`if it didn't tell you exactly what was happening as soon as the movie begane
`if the boyfriend wasn't asking for a beat down that entire movie
` the removal of most of the first hour of the movie.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Smiles on October 26, 2009, 10:10:37 pm
the last movie i saw in theaters was cloudy with a chance of meatballs and i thought it was awesome! ^_^ i would have given it five stars if i was a critic.  ;)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: xain on November 04, 2009, 05:11:00 am
last movie a saw was the invention of lying which i thoroughly enjoyed
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on November 04, 2009, 09:28:32 am
cant remember the last film I went to see in the cinema  :-\
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Emp_Dragon on November 04, 2009, 12:26:29 pm
I saw 'Passchendaele' a couple of nights ago, it was decent.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brion Foulke on November 04, 2009, 03:18:43 pm
I recently rented Adventureland, by the same guy who did Zombieland.  It even stars the same kid, though there are no zombies, it's about him working at a theme park over the summer.  Anyway it was a pretty great movie, but for completely different reasons than Zombieland.  If you liked Zombieland, check it out, even though there are no zombies!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: UmberIsSexy on November 04, 2009, 05:13:41 pm
I saw 'Passchendaele' a couple of nights ago, it was decent.
I didn't even notice that coming out.  Just decent?  Is it a straight-up war movie, or is it about something else?

There's a great Iron Maiden song with that name btw.

I saw 'This is It' the other day and enjoyed it very much, even though I have never liked Michael Jackson before.  I have quite a bit of respect for him now, as an artist anyway.  His music isn't really my cup of tea exactly, but I have to admit it's good stuff, especially in comparison to a lot of other "pop".
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on December 12, 2009, 05:09:38 pm
Princess and the Frog is great ya'll.

I mean, don't expect it to be as good as your favorite Disney Classic. I didn't think it was as good as Lion King or Aladdin. But, it was definitely better than anything post-Tarzan (with exceptions of Lilo and New Groove).

Keith David is a treat, if nothing else he'll definitely rank in the top Disney villains of all time. In the words of another character from the film, "He's very charismatic."

Go see it, yo!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on December 18, 2009, 04:18:36 pm
Just watched Cloverfield on DVD its an all right film.......but would like to of know what happened to the beastie at the end lol
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Selan on December 25, 2009, 10:23:03 am
Leana and i saw Avatar 3d yesterday, it was awesome!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on December 30, 2009, 06:46:25 am
So my boyfriend is taking me to see A Single Man for our annivesary (it's New Years). 
I am not really looking forward to it. It sounds so depressing. Part of me thinks he feels obligated to see it an "Important Gay Movie".  :-\
I saw Nine with him for Christmas. I didn't really like that either.  :(


Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on December 31, 2009, 12:09:33 pm
Leana and i saw Avatar 3d yesterday, it was awesome!

It was pretty good.  I liked the 3-D effects in the forest, during transfer of minds from human to Na'vi bodies, and for the computer screens, and many of the action sequences were genuinely exciting and/or suspenseful.  However, the story only kept me minimally engaged, and some of the acting was fairly weak (especially Stephen Lang as the Colonel--fairly generic).  But it kept me entertained throughout, so I wasn't too disappointed.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on December 31, 2009, 12:16:32 pm
Sherlock Holmes was an awesome movie! Go see it!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: UmberIsSexy on December 31, 2009, 10:50:11 pm
I don't remember where this came up but I've just watched Band of Brothers all the way through again.  The stuff in between the action scenes really does make the action scenes so much better.  I mean, really, the whole entire film is just amazingly engaging and I think it does so with, admittedly, taking a few dramatic liberties, but without going over the top and either glorifying war or relying on lots of unrealistic situations, either in the combat or the dramatic sequences, to evoke emotion.  It feels like you're watching something between film of real events and a dramatic production.  Also I am astounded by the incredible accuracy of the costumes, props, and filming environments, especially considering the range of places the 506 ends up in.  It's just amazing.

I think it's my favorite film of all time.  If it counts as a film.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on January 01, 2010, 12:47:27 am
Most of that was filmed near where my (now deceased *sniff*) Grandad lived Umber.  He could hear the gun fire going on at all times of day and night. It was filmed on the site of the old DeHaviland aircraft factory/airfield.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on January 02, 2010, 09:30:37 pm
Band of Brothers is more properly called a "miniseries".  :P
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on January 08, 2010, 02:48:48 pm
I saw Up in the Air this past Wednesday, and it was pretty good.  I missed the first nine minutes because I got mixed up on the showing time, and the bus was late, but I don't think I missed very much.  It started off slow, as straight comedy, but picked up the pace and the depth as it progressed.  By the end, it's an above average social commentary on the need to connect with people.  It didn't feel like a Best Picture to me, though, probably because the film is rather light with some heavier, darker moments at the climax and conclusion.  The film features very good acting and writing, but only occasionally shows dynamic cinematography.  So, I'd recommend renting it, but you don't absolutely need to see it in the theater.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: akashayi on January 08, 2010, 05:52:50 pm
Somehow, over the holidays, I watched Avatar (for free) a full three times. Two times in an imax theater and all three in 3d.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on January 08, 2010, 06:34:28 pm
It's called stealing dear.  ;)

So I saw a single man, and as it turns out, it's quite good, actually. I liked it because I like good movies with a good heart. When you summarize the plot thusly; It's about a gay man whose lover dies and he decides that he cannot handle it anymore and decides to kill himself. Then he spends the rest of the movie on the last day of he life trying to squeeze some pleasure and beauty out of it all before he offs himself. You may come off sounding kind of depressing. But- well it is kind of depressing but it's totally worth it because it's gorgeously filmed and acted and has a great message. I suggest you guys all see it.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on January 08, 2010, 09:24:20 pm
He's gay AND suicidal!?!?!?

I cannot exist in the same vicinity as such a blasphemy against a MAN'S SPIRIT.



Actually that's just the suicidal. Unless we commits seppuku to recover honor, or kills himself via enemy army.

Homosexuality is cool though. MANLY COMBINING can be VERY MANLY.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on January 09, 2010, 12:46:29 am
Actually it's all pretty stereotyped. Between the frequent alcoholism and the having to lie to your parents (and perhaps not having a woman around to smooth your rough edges, who knows,) gay men have a reputation for being pretty trigger-happy when comes to the whole suicide thing. Gary and I are lucky because neither of us really drink, so we're not quite as likely to be that be self destructive, but it seems as if some gay men aren't really happy unless we are trying ever so hard to be this archetypal tortured-artist character in the "play of our own life". I find it silly in the extreme.  ::)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on January 10, 2010, 06:05:10 pm
I hate tortured artists.

The only reason I don't torture artists is because that'd make them tortured artists, and I hate that!

Besides, I'm the villain of someone else's life. I just know it.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Foof on January 10, 2010, 09:57:19 pm
Just saw District 9.  Amazing, amazing movie.  I was blown away.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Stardreamer on January 17, 2010, 07:47:11 am
Just saw District 9.  Amazing, amazing movie.  I was blown away.

I wanted to see that too, everyone told me great about that moovie. Anyway I saw Avatar yesterday and it was sooooo amazing, the best money-spent-on-cinema since star wars III  :-*
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on February 02, 2010, 09:43:54 am
Just watched District 9 and The Hurt Locker both fantastic films.

*SPOILER ALERT**SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*

Laghed when a mercenary got taken out by a flying pig, reminded me of something discussed in another thread in here  ;D
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: UmberIsSexy on February 24, 2010, 11:41:24 pm
I wanted to see that too, everyone told me great about that moovie. Anyway I saw Avatar yesterday and it was sooooo amazing, the best money-spent-on-cinema since star wars III  :-*
yeah I liked Avatar quite a bit.  More fun than I've had going to the movies in years.

edit: I really like Stardreamer's sig.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: UmberIsSexy on February 25, 2010, 08:35:26 am
Most of that was filmed near where my (now deceased *sniff*) Grandad lived Umber.  He could hear the gun fire going on at all times of day and night. It was filmed on the site of the old DeHaviland aircraft factory/airfield.

What do you mean?  They reconstructed cities there?  Or what?  Which scenes were filmed there?  The Bastogne stuff? 
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on February 25, 2010, 09:01:34 am
most of the urban scenes and country side stuff was done on the old airfield there while the Bastogne winter scenes was done in a freezer with  exploding trees, Amazing what you find out with the specail DVD version (not the one with the dog tags though)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: parameciumkid on February 25, 2010, 08:45:38 pm
I'm about to go to bed but before I do I must cry to the world that Avatar was awesome. :-*
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: tbeean on March 04, 2010, 10:50:18 am
I'm about to go to bed but before I do I must cry to the world that Avatar was awesome. :-*
dang. i must see avatar. everyone i know is singing its praises. D;

personally, i have to say i'm a little excited about Alice In Wonderland.  :-*
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on March 04, 2010, 11:02:18 am
I'm about to go to bed but before I do I must cry to the world that Avatar was awesome. :-*
dang. i must see avatar. everyone i know is singing its praises. D;
Here's someone who isn't - it was distinctly meh. The visuals were very pretty, with great attention to detail, but frankly, it was a heavy-handed, predictable paint-by-numbers plot with shallow characters, and that beats you over the head with it's "Nature GOOD! Environment GOOD! Capitalism BAD! Hurting environment BAD! Military BAD!" Aesop.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: tbeean on March 04, 2010, 11:08:32 am
dang. i must see avatar. everyone i know is singing its praises. D;
Here's someone who isn't - it was distinctly meh. The visuals were very pretty, with great attention to detail, but frankly, it was a heavy-handed, predictable paint-by-numbers plot with shallow characters, and that beats you over the head with it's "Nature GOOD! Environment GOOD! Capitalism BAD! Hurting environment BAD! Military BAD!" Aesop.
paha. it doesn't sound so great now. just very cliché.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Emp_Dragon on March 04, 2010, 11:49:08 am
Well, humanity as a species isn't going to hit you with anything unpredictable anytime soon...


Spoiler below:

But one thing about Avatar that I found very interesting in hindsight is that just about every land animal on pandora EXEPT the Na'vi had six limbs each... wich makes me think the Na'vi would probably be decendants of a failed alien colonisation effort of that moon and not as native as they belive themselves to be. And due to the nature of the planet-wide neural network, I'd say that the entire sattelite is terraformed to the state it has in the movie, possibly even beeing a huge alien experiment in it's entirety. And as usual, the homo-sapien viral strain contaminates the lot XD
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on March 04, 2010, 12:03:37 pm
dang. i must see avatar. everyone i know is singing its praises. D;
Here's someone who isn't - it was distinctly meh. The visuals were very pretty, with great attention to detail, but frankly, it was a heavy-handed, predictable paint-by-numbers plot with shallow characters, and that beats you over the head with it's "Nature GOOD! Environment GOOD! Capitalism BAD! Hurting environment BAD! Military BAD!" Aesop.
paha. it doesn't sound so great now. just very cliché.
It's worth a watch, but not as good as everyone says it is, which is roughly something along the lines of "This movie is so good that it actually feels like it's felating you while you watch it."
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Emp_Dragon on March 04, 2010, 01:28:32 pm
Well, it's basically Braveheart in space
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on March 04, 2010, 01:42:03 pm
Well, it's basically Braveheart in space
Personally, I'd rather a ten thousand hairy scotsmen not felate me, thank you.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on March 04, 2010, 01:45:06 pm
 :-\ hated that film made a mockery of Scottish history. only thing they got right was the end.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Emp_Dragon on March 04, 2010, 02:15:08 pm
Well, churba, me neither, but, what did you think of my Avatar theory?
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on March 27, 2010, 04:13:13 pm
I saw Alice In Wonderland last week, and it was okay.  Very nice to look at, but the plot was rather boring.  However, Helena Bonham Carter delivered a very entertaining performance, and some of the 3-D effects were cool.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on March 29, 2010, 11:16:14 am
I saw Alice In Wonderland last week, and it was okay.  Very nice to look at, but the plot was rather boring.  However, Helena Bonham Carter delivered a very entertaining performance, and some of the 3-D effects were cool.

I thought Depp's performance was rather weak in that.
Among other things.

I also realized I'm sick of Burton's "Washed out and gray" aesthetic.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: parameciumkid on March 30, 2010, 05:30:22 pm
So I saw Nausicaa of the Valley of the Winds for the first time a few weeks ago, and I have to say it was pretty cool because I got to sample what anime was like way back in the 80s, not to mention that it was a good movie to begin with. I guess I sort of like the "be nice to insects" angle because that's exactly how I've always felt.

(BUG HATERS ARE RACISTS!)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on March 30, 2010, 06:54:06 pm
Nausicaa is a very good movie, but the manga is much better (much more depth, and overall a more interesting plot).
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: parameciumkid on April 01, 2010, 05:47:12 pm
WHAAAAAAAAT?
You shall tell me where I can access this manga!1!!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on April 03, 2010, 07:29:51 pm
You can probably get the Nausicaa manga from Borders, Amazon or any of the other big online booksellers, or directly from Viz.  It shouldn't yet be out of print.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on May 04, 2010, 07:07:30 pm
Hate to double post, but I saw Kick-Ass yesterday, and it more than lived up to its title.  You should all see it when you have an opportunity to do so, unless you're very squeamish about bloody violence.  As a bonus, I was the only person in the theater when I saw it, so it was almost like a private screening  ;D.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: No.Na. on May 11, 2010, 09:32:50 pm
I really need to see kick ass soon

I saw iron man 2 which was really good I like the shift to action, since the first one was mostly the story of iron man's origins.

I also saw how to train your dragon a while back... like 3 time XD I really liked it a lot.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on June 12, 2010, 08:16:39 pm
I thought that Iron Man 2 was pretty good, although I didn't really like Justin Hammer.  I actually saw it late last month, but forgot to post.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on June 13, 2010, 07:44:10 am
Saw Avitar (2D) at a mates house the other week. Thought it was pretty good wound him up by saying it was all right lol
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Eonknight on June 17, 2010, 04:54:39 pm
Avatar: I sort of agree with Churba about the simplistic screenplay, but it still is a wonderful movie. It's all in the storytelling. If you think about it, a few of Cameron's films had simplistic plots and heavyhanded morals (Abyss, Titanic), but were still great to watch.

Alice: haven't seen it yet, but I'm a fan of Burton. I will concede that he is somewhat of an acquired taste and that all his movies have the same aesthetics.

Imaginarium of Dr Parnassus: Fantastic. Reminded me somewhat of Big Fish.

Iron Man 2: One of the few overall well done Marvel franchises, with X-Men and Spiderman.

Sherlock Holmes: Enjoyed it thoroughly, with all of it's implausibility. Then again, I loved Snatch and Lock, stock...

Kick-Ass: Haven't seen it, but I saw Defendor, and that was such a great movie that I want to let some time pass before I see Kick-ass, to avoid direct comparisons.

Braveheart: I don't know Scottish history all that well, but it was obvious to me that it was "rewritten" for this flick. Still entertaining if you can view it like a "Robin Hood"-type movie.

District 9: Once again, proof that you don't need a gazillion-dollar Hollywood budget to make an excellent movie.

How to train your dragon: Great animated feature. One of the new classics.

So that's my two cents (er... more like eighteen cents, but anyway ::) ) about some of those movies.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on June 18, 2010, 10:05:33 am
Eon remember this about Braveheart the only thing that happened was the end and even that Wallace never shouted out "Freedom!".  Its all Hollywood Propaganda.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Eonknight on June 18, 2010, 10:44:28 am
Duly noted, sir!

At any rate, in Hollywood, never mistake Story and History.  ::)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on June 20, 2010, 06:14:14 pm
Avatar: I sort of agree with Churba about the simplistic screenplay, but it still is a wonderful movie. It's all in the storytelling. If you think about it, a few of Cameron's films had simplistic plots and heavyhanded morals (Abyss, Titanic), but were still great to watch.

A lot of people seem to say Avatar wasn't as good of a plot since it copies Pocahontas and Dances with wolves, but what those people fail to realize is that Cameron had the screen play for almost 20 years and just refused to make it into a movie until the technology could make the movie at the level he wanted.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on June 20, 2010, 06:20:38 pm
Avatar: I sort of agree with Churba about the simplistic screenplay, but it still is a wonderful movie. It's all in the storytelling. If you think about it, a few of Cameron's films had simplistic plots and heavyhanded morals (Abyss, Titanic), but were still great to watch.

A lot of people seem to say Avatar wasn't as good of a plot since it copies Pocahontas and Dances with wolves, but what those people fail to realize is that Cameron had the screen play for almost 20 years and just refused to make it into a movie until the technology could make the movie at the level he wanted.
If that's twenty years of refinement, he should pay someone who can write a decent fucking movie for him. I don't give a toss if people say "Ooh, it's pocahontas/dances with wolves/the smurfs(not kidding)" because that doesn't matter. It's ham-fisted, Preachy, has all the subtlety of a cannonball, hammers you over the head with the "Consumerisim BAD! Capitalisim BAD! Army BAD! Nature GOOD! Environmentalisim GOOD!" message has holes you can drive a semi truck through, hard-to-like main characters, and characters who are generally about as deep as a puddle of piss on a concrete floor, and whose motivations are so deep and complex that they could easily be replaced by "Err, just because?" and nobody would notice.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Eonknight on June 20, 2010, 08:33:47 pm
Avatar: I sort of agree with Churba about the simplistic screenplay, but it still is a wonderful movie. It's all in the storytelling. If you think about it, a few of Cameron's films had simplistic plots and heavyhanded morals (Abyss, Titanic), but were still great to watch.

A lot of people seem to say Avatar wasn't as good of a plot since it copies Pocahontas and Dances with wolves, but what those people fail to realize is that Cameron had the screen play for almost 20 years and just refused to make it into a movie until the technology could make the movie at the level he wanted.
If that's twenty years of refinement, he should pay someone who can write a decent fucking movie for him. I don't give a toss if people say "Ooh, it's pocahontas/dances with wolves/the smurfs(not kidding)" because that doesn't matter. It's ham-fisted, Preachy, has all the subtlety of a cannonball, hammers you over the head with the "Consumerisim BAD! Capitalisim BAD! Army BAD! Nature GOOD! Environmentalisim GOOD!" message has holes you can drive a semi truck through, hard-to-like main characters, and characters who are generally about as deep as a puddle of piss on a concrete floor, and whose motivations are so deep and complex that they could easily be replaced by "Err, just because?" and nobody would notice.

Again I sort of agree, Churba. You're right about the screenplay; it IS preachy, overly simplistic, very unsubtle in it's social criticism, etc. It's like "Ferngully" on steroids (a Don Bluth animated for kids). But I found it was well told and the photography was gorgeous. I guess learned to "block out" the "hammering". I liked Independence Day and Born on the 4th of July, despite the flag-waving. I liked JP Jeunet's take on Alien (Alien: Resurrection) despite a completely half-baked script that reeked of corporate greed. Basically, I mostly watch movies to switch my brain off and have a good time. It takes a very, very bad movie for me to say it "sucked". And the funny thing is it happened just yesterday: I loved Arturo Perez-Reverte's books on Captain Alatriste and I was looking forward to Alatriste, with Viggo Mortensen. You want bad storytelling? That movie is a perfect example of every conceivable "do not" in filmmaking. There is so much stuff crammed into this two hours movie that they can only skim on the main events (that's what happens when you try to fit a half-dozen books or more in a single movie). Therefore, the movie is just a collection of events in the life of Alatriste, with little connection to one another. So there is absolutely no character development, there are holes that could swallow a Boeing 777 and that make the story kind of hard to follow if you don't know the books. I would tell anyone to forget this movie was ever made and to keep with the books. I found that, for all its lacking, this was not the case for Avatar.

To me, Avatar was like Titanic: immature. Sure, they're good entertainment, but certainly not Movie of the Year material, IMHO. Now Defendor, on the other hand...  :P

Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on June 20, 2010, 11:11:09 pm
Avatar: I sort of agree with Churba about the simplistic screenplay, but it still is a wonderful movie. It's all in the storytelling. If you think about it, a few of Cameron's films had simplistic plots and heavyhanded morals (Abyss, Titanic), but were still great to watch.

A lot of people seem to say Avatar wasn't as good of a plot since it copies Pocahontas and Dances with wolves, but what those people fail to realize is that Cameron had the screen play for almost 20 years and just refused to make it into a movie until the technology could make the movie at the level he wanted.
If that's twenty years of refinement, he should pay someone who can write a decent fucking movie for him. I don't give a toss if people say "Ooh, it's pocahontas/dances with wolves/the smurfs(not kidding)" because that doesn't matter. It's ham-fisted, Preachy, has all the subtlety of a cannonball, hammers you over the head with the "Consumerisim BAD! Capitalisim BAD! Army BAD! Nature GOOD! Environmentalisim GOOD!" message has holes you can drive a semi truck through, hard-to-like main characters, and characters who are generally about as deep as a puddle of piss on a concrete floor, and whose motivations are so deep and complex that they could easily be replaced by "Err, just because?" and nobody would notice.
again, since it was created such a long time ago it was more in the age of people wanting effects and not storyline (which i have come to the conclusion that we are at such a level now that people actually care about story) and i dont think he really re-wrote it much from the time he came up with the storyline

and i was talking to some family friends about it today and i will adbit its very much like fern gully and they are both about the same age haha
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on July 22, 2010, 10:38:52 am
I saw Toy Story 3 not too long ago, and I liked it a lot (especially the bittersweet ending  :)).  It's not quite as good as the first two, but it's still much better than most movies in theaters now -- which tells you a lot about the studio's consistency.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on July 22, 2010, 05:35:11 pm
you must be joking! i thought TS3 was far better than 2, and almost as good as 1 (although little can surpass the first in any trilogy)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on August 10, 2010, 12:01:36 pm
Saw Inception not too long ago, and I agree with a review I read that the film looked very good but was emotionally lacking at points.  Excellent editing and action sequences, though.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on August 10, 2010, 01:34:21 pm
Saw Inception not too long ago, and I agree with a review I read that the film looked very good but was emotionally lacking at points.  Excellent editing and action sequences, though.
(http://bit.ly/bF26J3)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on August 10, 2010, 03:02:27 pm
I want to see Scott Pilgrim vs. the world.
It looks real fun!  :D
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on August 11, 2010, 08:13:25 pm
I want to see Scott Pilgrim vs. the world.
It looks real fun!  :D
the only problem is i hate the lead actor (not to mention can never remember his name) due to his voice and overall acting like a pussy
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on August 12, 2010, 06:58:55 am
I like him for that exact reason.  :-*

I would totally stick it in Micheal Cera's butt!  :-*
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Selan on August 12, 2010, 07:05:15 am
Oh wow!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on August 13, 2010, 03:25:45 pm
Well ill leave you to that as i am a heterosexual (yes, i know, boring :P)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on August 16, 2010, 05:58:17 pm
Nobody's perfect.  ;)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on August 16, 2010, 10:28:53 pm
Nobody's perfect.  ;)

Michael Cera is perfect.

Perfectly pathetic. He ruined that movie for me.

Well, the movie wasn't my style that much anyways. Too hipsterish.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on August 16, 2010, 10:36:57 pm
Nobody's perfect.  ;)

Michael Cera is perfect.

Perfectly pathetic. He ruined that movie for me.

Well, the movie wasn't my style that much anyways. Too hipsterish.
Well, to be fair, It's EXACTLY his kinda role - Kinda hopeless guy awkwardly going after the girl of his dreams.
Seriously, that's Cera in every movie.

Though, I do think that the Cera-hate is getting a little too trendy-bullshit for my taste, to the point where I've spoken to people who hate him for being a terrible actor, and not funny - without seeing 99% of his output. Usually, they've only seen one movie, or a few episodes of Arrested Development, if anything at all. Nothing against you, CDSM, just as a general comment.

Though, I'd really like you to define hipsterish - From what I've seen and noted as is generally thought to be "Hipster", this movie is damn near the perfect antithesis of it. Big Marketing Machine, Midnight releases, Massive special effects and CGI, Mainstream pop culture references and some really big, well known bands working with it(for example - Beck wrote all of the music for Sex bom-omb, though the actors actually performed it for the movie) for a start. I mean, Fair enough you don't like the movie, it wasn't perfect, but hipsterish it most definitely was not.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on August 17, 2010, 02:10:49 am
Well, to be fair, It's EXACTLY his kinda role - Kinda hopeless guy awkwardly going after the girl of his dreams.
Seriously, that's Cera in every movie.

Though, I do think that the Cera-hate is getting a little too trendy-bullshit for my taste, to the point where I've spoken to people who hate him for being a terrible actor, and not funny - without seeing 99% of his output. Usually, they've only seen one movie, or a few episodes of Arrested Development, if anything at all. Nothing against you, CDSM, just as a general comment.

Well, I've seen several of his deals, including, on a regrettably bored and forlorn late afternoon-evening, Year One. Of course, I disliked him from the instant I saw him, so I guess I still fall into that mold.

Quote
Though, I'd really like you to define hipsterish - From what I've seen and noted as is generally thought to be "Hipster", this movie is damn near the perfect antithesis of it. Big Marketing Machine, Midnight releases, Massive special effects and CGI, Mainstream pop culture references and some really big, well known bands working with it(for example - Beck wrote all of the music for Sex bom-omb, though the actors actually performed it for the movie) for a start. I mean, Fair enough you don't like the movie, it wasn't perfect, but hipsterish it most definitely was not.

Hipsterish is like emo, it means whatever you want it to me in a vague, undefined sense.
It was based on a hipsterish comic book, anyway.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Churba on August 17, 2010, 02:53:47 am
Well, I've seen several of his deals, including, on a regrettably bored and forlorn late afternoon-evening, Year One. Of course, I disliked him from the instant I saw him, so I guess I still fall into that mold.
Nah, that's entirely fair. Like I said, it's just the people who do it because it's trendy, they piss me off.

Quote
Hipsterish is like emo, it means whatever you want it to me in a vague, undefined sense.
It was based on a hipsterish comic book, anyway.
I don't think that's valid - I mean, yeah, emo - as an example - can mean whatever you want, but it's not like you're going to call the happy, socially and academically successful jock who listens to hip-hop and has no significant personal problems an emo, it's the kid with few friends, listening to My Chemical Romance alone in their room, with the goth-ish clothing, writing shitty poetry about pain and suffering, then scratching themselves for attention and calling it cutting, that who you'd call emo. If you distill down to the shared properties of the people you call Emo, you come to a decent definition.

As for the comic book - Well, it wasn't really hipsterish, again. It lacked everything that one would think of as the properties of a hipster work, other than that it wasn't mainstream, until you consider the medium - In the comic book world, it was VERY mainstream, some seriously hot property. Again, I don't think it's hipsterish, and really, if you apply the definition too broadly, you end up with a useless definition.

It's like the world "Troll" on the internet, now, if you want an example - It's essentially useless and pointless, because where once it was people deliberately fishing for a negative reaction, throwing out bait and dragging it along, and seeing who bites, it's now just generally used on damn near anyone who disagrees with someone, especially if the person being disagreed with is the one holding the majority opinion.

Again - I'm not saying you have to LIKE the movie, I mean, I loved it and even I had my problems with it. However, it really just isn't hipsterish at all.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Zearth on August 17, 2010, 08:46:28 am
Hipster and Emo really are not the same thing. Hipsters (as far as i have always understood the word) are almost modern day hippies (and this is actually in the dictionary) while emo refers to someone who is overly emotional and all-in-all a cheap imitation of goth.

As for Michael Cera, i've seen him in most of his movies because the movies themselves appeal to teens/young adults but at the same time i cant stand anytime he is the main actor because of the parts he is given and not at all his acting abilities (which although not Leanardo DiCaprio status, are not terrible)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on August 17, 2010, 09:42:25 am
I love Micheal Cera. I like him so much that I see any movie he's in.  :D
He's adorable and he's a good actor.

As far as the hipster argument, I don't think you can be a hipster without a requisite amount of arrogant elitism.
Cera could play a kid who works at a record store and wears skinny jeans and trucker hats and he still wouldn't come off as a hipster to me. He's too humble. His just too nice! :-*
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: CrystalDragonSpaceMarine on August 17, 2010, 02:00:28 pm
Quote
As for the comic book - Well, it wasn't really hipsterish, again. It lacked everything that one would think of as the properties of a hipster work, other than that it wasn't mainstream, until you consider the medium - In the comic book world, it was VERY mainstream, some seriously hot property. Again, I don't think it's hipsterish, and really, if you apply the definition too broadly, you end up with a useless definition.


Well, I heard it said somewhere that it was popular with the hipster crowd, so that person probably didn't know what hipster was either.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: RoninAngel on August 17, 2010, 02:39:28 pm
I love my chemical romance!  :D

I also really like Fall Out Boy. And I LOVE LINKIN PARK SO MUCH IT MAKES ME WANT TO DIE! [holds up hands in devil horns!/]
Do Blink 182 count? How about that My Own Worst Enemy by Lit???  ???

These so-called "hipster" and "emo" bands are some of the only somewhat hard sounding rock and punk bands on the radio. I think a lot of them are really good. I also love a lot of so-called "symphonic" and "goth" metal and I don't care if Evanescence used to be a Christian band or if Within Temptation is foreign.  I love "hipster music", apparently. 

I don't like the crappy fashions of worn by a lot of hipster kids (such as skinny jeans, if I wore those my balls would simultaneously stick out and ride up). I don't hang out at brew pubs. I hate fat tire (although to be fair I hate all beer), dislike going to live shows, I would never be needlessly rude to someone if I worked at a coffee shop, or music store or whatever. I definitely am not in the financial bracket that a lot of the things on "Stuff White People Like" but I still think that site is hilarious. Regardless of weather I can afford all of it, almost everything on that site could either be applied to myself or someone I know. I love Asian Girls, Religions That My Parents Don't Belong To, Dogs and Hummus for instance.  ;)
http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/full-list-of-stuff-white-people-like/

I fucking hate the idea that something (especially music) is cooler the more obscure it is, and I although I like Irony, "post-irony" and/or being so sarcastic that you aren't sure whether you are actually not telling the truth is both baffling and nauseating to me.

So am I a hipster?

Many might say yes, even though the folks I hang out with all swear up and down that they hate hipsters and not being anything like them. I think hipster mostly just "liberal white person who seems trendy and you don't like".


EDIT: Also, I am at a loss about what to say about Questionable Content, "the quintessential hipster webcomic" I like the comic okay in general, but I find most of the characters alternately identifiable and fun or hair-pulling-ly annoying. I almost stopped reading it because of all the super-annoying indy-rock references and then they suddenly disappeared. So what the fuck does that say?
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on November 26, 2010, 08:20:24 am
OK, it's been a few months, and I've seen a few movies since then.

1.  Scott Pilgrim vs. The World:  Very good, although I don't agree that Scott deserves his ending.

2.  The Social Network:  Well-made, but it's very difficult to care for the characters, or to feel emotionally-attached to the story.  It's a movie I could think deeply about, but I don't feel a great deal for it.  Still, a good movie worth checking out.

3.  Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1:  Also well-made, but rather simple and straightforward upon further reflection.  I enjoyed it very much in the moment, but it didn't stick with me after I left the theater.  It also didn't feel like a Harry Potter film, but rather a fantastical thriller.

Anyone else see any movies?
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brekkjern on December 22, 2010, 06:23:00 pm
TRON: Legacy

WAS WIN!

MUSIC WAS WIN!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Blue Dragon on December 22, 2010, 11:53:32 pm
I wanted to see that Scott Pilgrim movie, but haven't had the chance. Looked kinda funny.

I've been into watching movies with Gael Garcia Bernal (uh...his last name is spelled wrong.) He's an AMAZING actor! Most people are probably familiar with The Motorcycle Diaries (excellent) and Y Tu Mama, Tambien, but he's also been in some really weird films like La Mala de Education and The Night Buffalo (forgot how to say it in Spanish. Oops.)

Just watched the new Robin Hood which wasn't too bad. :)

I agree about the Harry Potter movie, it was okay, but not as good as the book. Just not really...I don't know. It's just missing something.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brekkjern on January 11, 2011, 06:59:29 am
Just saw 2001: A space odyssey.

It was weird...
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: DruffyB on January 11, 2011, 01:02:03 pm
Just watched Teenage Hooker Became A Killing MAchine!

So shite it was brilliant!
1 hour long....
15 minute intro
5 minute long dancing sequence
2 minutes of an old woman ranting about people havingsex outside her door!

BRILLIANT!
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brion Foulke on January 11, 2011, 04:07:25 pm
Some movies I saw in the theatre recently that I loved:

True Grit: Really *really* good movie, one of the best westerns I've ever seen.  It's by the Coen Brothers, so it's a little different from other westerns.  Jeff Bridges and the girl in it are both really really good.

Black Swan: I liked it a lot.  It's creepy and interesting.

And some movies I netflixed recently that I loved:

After Hours: Wow, I had never heard of this Scorsese movie before, but it was great.  It's completely different from his other movies, it's kind of a surreal black comedy about a guy who gets stuck in Soho NY and has run ins with all sorts of strange people.  Really good movie.

Gran Torino: Glad I caught up with this movie, it's so good.

Paranormal Activity: Hated it, thought the writing was bad and didn't like either of the main characters.  It's well made so I can see how some people might be scared by it if they like the characters, though.

The Wicker Man: (The original) Great dream-like movie with fantastic music.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: charles on January 12, 2011, 03:58:35 am
Tangled: Well done all 'round.  A bit reminisant of Shrek movies in some parts.  They did some really excellent work with the hair's uses but it felt like they got a bit lazy about it towards the end.  Actually, most of the end felt like it just slowed down too much or they simply ran out of ideas for a bit of fun and fast moving action amongst all the chatter.  Basically the buildup to the climactic ending was missing buildup and maybe even a climax... you should never skip the climax.  now that I think about it, many of the Shrek movies were much the same with plenty of fun action in the first two thirds and then mellowed out in the end.  But as before it was well done all 'round and the first two thirds of the movie's action and fun made up for it... Also, great story interpretation and expansion on the whole Repunzel tale.

Paprika: Mostly Awesome all-round.  Its one of those in-depth, philosophical movies to a good extent, but it does a beautiful job of dazzling you with the fantastical and not leaving you simply feeling mind-fucked for having watched it  (Donny Darko and Mulholland Drive were good at that).  I'd put watching this one off for ages, not thinking it was worth my time, but it does flips over some of the Studio Ghibli fantasticals like Spirited Away or Howl's Moving Castle.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Blue Dragon on January 12, 2011, 12:40:47 pm
^Good one, on Paprika. I loved that film! Same dude did Millenium Actress and "Perfect Blue." Both good films, also.


I'm getting ready to see Black Swan. I'm looking forward to it :)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Oddball on January 12, 2011, 01:13:59 pm
Who decided to cast Nicholas Cage as Edward Woodward's character in the "remake" of The Wicker Man any way?  >:(
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: charles on January 12, 2011, 01:35:26 pm
^Good one, on Paprika. I loved that film! Same dude did Millenium Actress and "Perfect Blue." Both good films, also.

Another two films I've put off for ages.  I even have a copy of Millenium Actress!  Right, under your recommendation, I'm going to put some effort into watching them.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brion Foulke on January 13, 2011, 11:19:31 pm
All of Satoshi Kon's movies are fantastic... Perfect Blue, Milenium Actress, Paprika, and Tokyo Grandfathers. It's a real shame that dude is gone.

Black Swan is good, it's not for everyone, though.  It's not even close to as good as The Wrestler, but still a pretty good flick.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: DruffyB on January 14, 2011, 12:48:28 pm
All of Satoshi Kon's movies are fantastic... Perfect Blue, Milenium Actress, Paprika, and Tokyo Grandfathers. It's a real shame that dude is gone.

Yeah first Kon and then Captain Beefheart. Last year sucked! :(

Yeah I've watched all these. I recommend it to anyone!  ;)
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: charles on January 15, 2011, 10:12:32 pm
Millennium Actress:  *SOB* *SOB* *CRY* IIITS... IIITS SSSSOOOO BEEEUUTIFULLLL BWAAAAAHAHAAHAHAAAA AND SSSOSSOSOSSSOOOO SAAAAAAAAD!!!!

EDIT: Alright, seriously this is a pretty good movie.  not a big action thing or so much fantastical like Paprika in any sense, but its just a wonderful life's love story told in a very interesting way.  The important thing to remember in watching this film is that no matter what is happening you are always being told the love story of the actress' life and a sad but beautiful story it is.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on February 01, 2011, 02:13:50 pm
I thought Black Swan was very good.  There were some moments where I thought "Wow, did that really just happen?", because they were so outrageous, but overall the film was very entertaining and well-acted.  I've also recently seen The Fighter (which was excellent) and The King's Speech (solidly good, but it didn't wow me).  Some pundits are saying that the latter might win the Oscar for Best Picture, but I don't think it was that outstanding.  Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush really anchored the film, though there were some nice moments from the other actors (such as George VI's two young daughters, Margaret and Elizabeth).
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Pwncho on February 01, 2011, 05:04:26 pm
Think that the last movie I saw in theatres was 'gunless' a long time ago... just watched quick and the dead for like the 8th time though... man i love that movie.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Ryuu on February 01, 2011, 06:29:42 pm
i watched 'the girl who leaped through time' a few days ago another amazing film from Studio Ghibly
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on April 03, 2011, 06:08:42 pm
I still need to see The Girl Who Leaped Through Time (and Summer Wars, by the same director).  I recently saw Sucker Punch, and it was better than I thought it was going to be (given the terrible reviews).  The plot, dialogue and acting all could have been much better, and the action sequences could have used a bit more "oomph" (and less slow motion and camera tricks, which I'll admit became tedious as the film progressed).  But mostly, it was an entertaining action film with a purpose, though the film's ending doesn't clarify that purpose nearly as well as it should have (despite the clever plot twist).  I give it a C+.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: L0g0s on April 04, 2011, 01:59:59 pm
Just finished "The Long Way Round"  which might also be characterized as a mini-series really.  But, I don't go to the movies that often, and all my TV watching is limited to netflix.   (I have to force myself to sit still long enough to watch anything anymore.  My TV time is down to about 2.5 hours a week.) 
Ewan McGregor And Charles Booreman ride motorcycles around the world from London to New York via such lovely places as Siberia.  Wouldn't say it was awesome, but it was entertaining. 
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on April 30, 2011, 01:53:33 pm
At the movie theater, I recently saw Hanna, which was pretty good.  It's a bit Bourne-esque, but with a teenage girl assassin (Hanna's friendship with Sophie is particularly effective).  On DVD, I have seen and enjoyed Tokyo Story and Michael Clayton.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: L0g0s on June 10, 2011, 04:40:05 pm
Just watched "OldBoy"

Korean flick.  EXCELLENTLY done.  It's a combination comedy/psychological horror/action/thriller flick.  The comedy isn't too heavy though, and I will say straight up, it was a great movie, but it got a little sick and twisted, so if you can't handle a little bit of graphic mutilation and straight up wrongness, stay away. 
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Japaka on June 11, 2011, 05:58:38 pm
Just saw My Blueberry Nights. I liked it, got a bit "heavy" in some parts, and it's kind of weird, but it still left me with a nice feeling at the end.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: L0g0s on June 14, 2011, 07:12:37 pm
Just saw three in a row. 

X-men: First class.   ehhhh a solid okay.  I'm not puking, I'm not thrilled.  Kevin Bacon wins the movie though for bringing the Bond villain vibe.

Resident Evil: Afterlife
Production value dropped from the previous ones, does very little to drive the plot.  Milla cute as ever.  Had some funny bits.  I liked it, but nothing to really write home about.

M
The groundbreaking 1931 film, featuring Peter Lorre, cinema's first serial killer, and Fritz Lang's first talking picture.
Pleasantly surprised that the film holds up pretty well.  Once again, Lang's a pretty skilled director.   I liked it. 
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on June 28, 2011, 08:15:12 pm
Just saw Super 8 earlier today, and for being the "movie of the summer", it was quite underwhelming.  It was very good, but not mind-blowing.  I also saw Kung-Fu Panda 2 recently, which was very good (though the "inner peace" fight move required suspension of disbelief).

For DVDs, I recommend Dan in Real Life, Manderlay, and Changeling.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: L0g0s on July 01, 2011, 12:57:59 pm
The Losers

Movie adaptation of the comic book.  I've never read the comic, so, can't comment on that.
As for the movie itself, a solid good time movie.  Is it a thought provoking piece?  No.  Is it high art?  No.  Is it solidly enjoyable and amusing?  Yes.  Good action, and good laughs. 

GO PETUNIAS.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Kanazaka on September 17, 2011, 05:16:06 pm
Well, I've seen a lot of movies recently.  Since I last posted, I saw Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2, Crazy, Stupid, Love and The Help in theaters.  Harry Potter was by far the best of the three.  I also recently got around to seeing The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, and it was excellent.  I also recommend checking out Departures and Mission Impossible III on DVD.
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: L0g0s on October 04, 2011, 07:03:52 pm
After a lack of movies for awhile, I just saw Disney's "Tangled."

Amusing throughout, and it kept me not only smiling, but laughing.  Which can be hard to do.  The animation, with regards to character expression was *Excellent*.   Sure, background charaters, not so much, but the main cast was very well fleshed out and animated.  A few too many side kicks maybe?  No one stood out enough to top the others, but they were all amusing.  It felt like they maybe didn't know where they were going with the story, but still very much worth a watch.

And it's been years, but I was talking to someone else about the movie today, if you haven't ever seen "Cool Hand Luke", do yourself a favor and find a copy to watch.

"Shakin' tha bush Boss!"
Title: Re: Movies!
Post by: Brekkjern on November 01, 2011, 06:59:15 pm
If you are thinking of going to the theaters soon, do so. Tintin is a masterpiece of a movie. I would highly recommend seeing it.